Kon Knueppel has given Hornets an uncomfortable question they need to address

Should the Hornets build around K2?
Charlotte Hornets, Kon Knueppel
Charlotte Hornets, Kon Knueppel | Jeff Hanisch-Imagn Images

Something is shifting in Charlotte — and it’s happening faster than anyone expected. Another early-season stretch without LaMelo Ball and Brandon Miller has reopened an old wound: The Charlotte Hornets still don’t know if their franchise cornerstones can stay on the floor. But this time, something else has happened too.

Kon Knueppel has arrived.

And over the last two weeks, he hasn’t just kept Charlotte afloat — he’s reshaped the entire discussion about the Hornets’ rebuild.

A rookie with veteran-level production

Knueppel’s surge has been impossible to ignore. While Ball was sidelined, the rookie averaged 21.8 points, 8.4 rebounds, and 4.0 assists per contest over a five-game heater, while posting an elite 61.1 percent true shooting. Even his full-season line — 17.9 points, 6.1 rebounds, 2.8 assists per match — undersells how dramatically he changes the team’s floor.

The on/off numbers tell the real story. The Hornets score 6.3 more points per 100 possessions with Knueppel on the floor versus when he sits.

That’s not the profile of a Rookie of the Year; that’s the profile of a foundational player.

How Knueppel is actually dominating — not just hanging on

Most rookies try to survive NBA physicality. Knueppel is dictating how games are played.

His scoring versatility jumps off the screen. He’s already one of the league’s most advanced movers without the ball — setting screens, slipping them, relocating into daylight, and cutting at perfect angles for easy points. Charlotte uses him like a veteran connector: an offensive piece who unlocks spacing and flow for everyone else.

His 32-point homecoming performance against Milwaukee felt like a watershed moment. Knueppel simply carved them apart with relocation threes, delayed cuts, and mismatched punishes. He did it without elite burst or flashy handles — only timing, IQ, and an intuitive understanding of where advantages live.

Charlotte doesn’t just run offense with him on the floor. They look organized.

The IQ and playmaking that change everything

You don’t post a top-three team impact score as a rookie without doing the little things exceptionally well. Knueppel’s connective playmaking is already among the best on the roster — the quick reversal passes, the kickout reads, the one-more-passes after offensive rebounds, and the sneaky on-ball craft when bigger defenders close too high.

He’s not a “heliocentric” creator like Ball, but he’s a floor-raiser who makes the whole offense more stable.

He plays like a veteran version of the player he was during his ACC Tournament MVP run at Duke: low mistakes, high efficiency, perfect reads, and elite processing speed.

Rebounding, defense, and things Ball and Miller don’t do

Knueppel’s offense is easy to appreciate. His rebounding and defense are why this conversation matters.

He’s already one of Charlotte’s top defensive rebounders — second on the team in defensive rebounding rate. His ability to end possessions and immediately trigger transition sets him apart from Ball and Miller, both of whom lean more offense-first and can drift off the glass.

Defensively, he’s strong, physical, and rarely out of position. He’s not a lockdown wing, but he competes, communicates, and rotates. And because of his size and instincts, he doesn’t hemorrhage points like Charlotte’s rookie wings often have in past seasons.

This matters because it raises a real question: Is Knueppel the most reliable two-way player on the roster already? Through 12 games, the answer might be yes.

The case against solely building around Ball or Miller

This isn’t a referendum on talent. Ball’s playmaking genius is rare. Miller’s shot-creation flashes are real.

But both players carry the same two problems: availability and one-way impact.

Ball has missed more games than he’s played over the last three years. Miller has already suffered two different early-season injuries. Together, they form one of the most uncertain cornerstone duos in the league.

Knueppel, meanwhile, has been the metronome — present, poised, productive.

He doesn’t need volume to score. He doesn’t need the ball to influence possessions. He doesn’t need defensive concessions to stay playable.

His style fits with Ball and Miller. But crucially, the offense doesn’t collapse when he becomes the focal point.

That’s the difference between a complementary starter and a potential franchise hub.

Can Knueppel be the guy?

There are compelling arguments on both sides.

He’s already shown the following skills at an elite level: scoring at multiple levels, elite IQ and processing, real two-way value, immediate leadership traits through consistency, and drives winning even without star athleticism.

Yet, these limits have also been exposed: no real burst, which could cap his playoff upside, Ball and Miller’s talent ceilings remain higher, and Knueppel may be best used as a “super-connector,” not a No. 1 engine.

But Charlotte may not need a traditional heliocentric star. They may need a stabilizer — someone who makes everyone better.

And Knueppel already does that.

Where the Hornets go from here

Building a team around Knueppel doesn’t mean abandoning Ball or Miller. It means re-centering the offense around reliability, IQ, and flow — and letting Ball and Miller complement that identity rather than define it.

If the Hornets want a foundation that doesn’t vanish every time the injury report drops, Knueppel might be the safest — and smartest — anchor.

So the question stands: Has Kon Knueppel already earned the right to be Charlotte’s centerpiece?
Or are Ball and Miller still the future if they can stay healthy enough to prove it?

Either way, the Hornets suddenly have a real conversation on their hands — and that alone is a sign of progress.

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations